Three steps to a pre-submission verdict
From upload to action list, before you hit submit.
-
01Upload & pick a venue▶
Drop in your paper (.tex or .pdf), optionally add your bibliography (.bib), and choose your target conference or journal.
-
02We run the checks▶
Five engines run: venue fit, benchmarking against accepted peers, structure, honesty & integrity, and a submission-package review.
-
03Get an action list▶
An acceptance-likelihood estimate plus concrete, prioritised fixes — with a plain-English summary across all engines.
Five engines, one verdict
Venue fit
Does the paper match the scope, format, and expectations of the target conference or journal?
Peer benchmarking
How does the manuscript compare against recently accepted papers at the same venue?
Structure
Section completeness, ordering, and the presence of the components reviewers expect.
Honesty & integrity
Flags overclaiming and integrity issues — e.g. unverified “Dr./PhD” claims, former-employer mentions, or missing affiliations — using an optional, fully user-controlled profile.
Submission package
Upload your submission .zip (LaTeX source, .bib, figures); PaperQC checks portal file rules and recompiles from scratch to confirm a reviewer can build it.
Plain-English summary
Ask anything about your results, or get a plain-language summary across all engines and a downloadable PDF.